Complexity of problems concerning reset words for some partial cases of automata

A word w is called a reset word for a deterministic finite automaton A if it maps all states of A to one state. A word w is called a compressing to M states for a deterministic finite automaton A if it maps all states of A to at most M states. We consider several subclasses of automata: aperiodic, D-trivial, monotonic, partially monotonic automata and automata with a zero state. For these subclasses we study the computational complexity of the following problems. Does there exist a reset word for a given automaton? Does there exist a reset word of given length for a given automaton? What is the length of the shortest reset word for a given automaton? Moreover, we consider complexity of the same problems for compressing words

P(l)aying for Synchronization

Two topics are presented: synchronization games and synchronization costs. In a synchronization game on a deterministic finite automaton, there are two players, Alice and Bob, whose moves alternate. Alice wants to synchronize the given automaton, while Bob aims to make her task as hard as possible. We answer a few natural questions related to such games. Speaking about synchronization costs, we consider deterministic automata in which each transition has a certain price. The problem is whether or not a given automaton can be synchronized within a given budget. We determine the complexity of this problem. We also formulate a few open questions.Comment: Version 1 (by F\"odor Fominykh and Mikhail Volkov): 12 pages, 5 figures, close to the version published in the Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata (LNCS 7381). Version 2: 19 pages, 7 figures, one of the problems left open in Version 1 solved, submitte

Synchronizing automata over nested words

We extend the concept of a synchronizing word from deterministic finite-state automata (DFA) to nested word automata (NWA): A well-matched nested word is called synchronizing if it resets the control state of any configuration, i. e., takes the NWA from all control states to a single control state. We show that although the shortest synchronizing word for an NWA, if it exists, can be (at most) exponential in the size of the NWA, the existence of such a word can still be decided in polynomial time. As our main contribution, we show that deciding the existence of a short synchronizing word (of at most given length) becomes PSPACE-complete (as opposed to NP-complete for DFA). The upper bound makes a connection to pebble games and Strahler numbers, and the lower bound goes via small-cost synchronizing words for DFA, an intermediate problem that we also show PSPACE-complete. We also characterize the complexity of a number of related problems, using the observation that the intersection nonemptiness problem for NWA is EXP-complete

Complexity of Problems Concerning Reset Words for Some Partial Cases of Automata

A word w is called a reset word for a deterministic finite automaton A if it maps all states of A to one state. A word w is called a compressing to M states for a deterministic finite automaton A if it maps all states of A to at most M states. We consider several subclasses of automata: aperiodic, D-trivial, monotonic, partially monotonic automata and automata with a zero state. For these subclasses we study the computational complexity of the following problems. Does there exist a reset word for a given automaton? Does there exist a reset word of given length for a given automaton? What is the length of the shortest reset word for a given automaton? Moreover, we consider complexity of the same problems for compressing words

Complexity of problems concerning reset words for cyclic and Eulerian automata

A word is called a reset word for a deterministic finite automaton if it maps all states of this automaton to one state. We consider two classes of automata: cyclic automata and Eulerian automata. For these classes we study the computational complexity of the following problems: does there exist a reset word of given length for a given automaton? what is the minimal length of the reset words for a given automaton? © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Synchronization of automata with one undefined or ambiguous transition

We consider the careful synchronization of partial automata with only one undefined transition and the generalized synchronization of nondeterministic automata with only one ambiguous transition. For each of the two cases we prove that the problem of checking whether or not a given automaton is synchronizable is PSPACE-complete. The restrictions of these problems to 2-letter automata are also PSPACE-complete. © 2012 Springer-Verlag

Synchronizing automata over nested words

We extend the concept of a synchronizing word from deterministic finite-state automata (DFA) to nested word automata (NWA): A well-matched nested word is called synchronizing if it resets the control state of any configuration, i.e., takes the NWA from all control states to a single control state. We show that although the shortest synchronizing word for an NWA, if it exists, can be (at most) exponential in the size of the NWA, the existence of such a word can still be decided in polynomial time. As our main contribution, we show that deciding the existence of a short synchronizing word (of at most given length) becomes PSPACE-complete (as opposed to NP-complete for DFA). The upper bound makes a connection to pebble games and Strahler numbers, and the lower bound goes via small-cost synchronizing words for DFA, an intermediate problem that we also show PSPACE-complete. We also characterize the complexity of a number of related problems, using the observation that the intersection nonemptiness problem for NWA is EXP-complete